Oracle California

Prophet California Presentation/Background On May 31, 2001, Oracle Corporation (Oracle), with the help of its reliant dealer Logicon Inc (Logicon), fixed a six-year venture authorizing understanding (ELA) with the territory of California to give statewide database programming and upkeep backing to more than 270,000 state representatives. On face esteem, the agreement, worth nearly $95 million, appeared to be gainful to the state in not just accomplishing critical volume limits by comprehensively permitting the product, yet in addition lessening its general authoritative expenses (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Generally speaking, it was contended by Oracle and Logicon’s authorities that the statewide programming agreement would assist California with setting aside to $100 million in taxpayers’ dollars more than six to 10 years (Borland, 2002; Gilbert 2002b).Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on Oracle California explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More But as no ted in a report by the California State Auditor, this agreement could have seen the state burn through $6 million to $41 million more on Oracle database programming and upkeep support than it would have if no agreement was fixed (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). The current paper breaks down the Oracle and California case top to bottom, its significant on-screen characters, activating powers, results and long haul impacts. Issue Discussion The Oracle and province of California case, it tends to be contended, rotates around poor contracting rehearses as saw by the escape clauses and oversights inborn when the state went into an ELA with Oracle (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Data innovation (IT) is commonly viewed as an empowering agent of the state’s readiness, especially when its utilization brings about enormous cost efficiencies and profitability (Reddick, 2012). In this specific case, in any case, â€Å"†¦a primer study by the Department of Information Technology (DOIT) of 127 state offices two months sooner unequivocally proposed that generally hardly any state laborers may need or need any new Oracle Corporation (Oracle) products† (Howle Hendrickson, 2002, p. 1). However, state authorities proceeded to become tied up with the arrangement in spite of earlier information from the review which hinted that Oracle items were not a need. Furthermore, it is clear how Logicon, the authority affiliate for Oracle, immediately drenched itself in the arrangement and focused on key contacts that it would require in Sacramento political circles not exclusively to win political partiality (Borland, 2002), yet in addition procure abundantly in an arrangement that state authorities concede they never set aside sufficient effort to discover Logicon’s information (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). While it is doubtful that Oracle saw the California case considering exploitation because of political temperatures suggestive of a political race year (Gilbert, 2002a), it is apparent how the agreement was grounded in political impact and smoothed by legislative hall connections (Borland, 2002). Be that as it may, despite the fact that the state administrative review board of trustees held two months hearings with 30 observers and 2500 pages of archives, opposing declaration all through the preliminary demonstrated lacking in giving an exact image of how the multi-million arrangement was concluded or organized (Borland, 2002). Subsequently, the accompanying examination is an endeavor to give inside and out bits of knowledge into some abrogating situations of the case.Advertising Looking for paper on business financial aspects? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Analysis To date, it stays hard to layout the propensities of Oracle and California case, yet at any rate we would now be able to delineate the elements that become possibly the most important factor to encourage the case. In one of his proposals to the Governor’s office, Kelso refered to in Peterson (2002) advocates for â€Å"†¦a more clear task of jobs and obligations regarding IT arranging, the executives, acquirement and venture management† (p. 1). The absence of this capacity combined with a flawed contracting framework, in my view, permitted Logicon the chance to misuse powerless administration structures and push through a faulty arrangement. While the state was loosing cash, Logicon remained to make a gigantic $28 million from the ELA, a reality that state authorities might not have been notified of (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Political moves with respect to Logicon to guarantee the agreement experienced convoluted issues (Gilbert, 2002a), yet not to the degree exhibited by state administrators, who not just neglected to examine the arrangement as much as possible have, yet never addressed Oracle’s guarantees of cost reserve funds and gauges for the quantity of permits to operate th at the state would require (Borland, 2002). As of recently, it is yet indistinct why the above oversights and blunders were submitted. Albeit eventually California formally dropped the rambling six-year contract with Oracle on July 23 2002 (Borland, 2002; Gilbert, 2002b), opposing declaration all through the preliminary implies that it may not be clear how and why these oversights and blunders went unnoticed (Borland, 2002). Until now, as indicated by this creator, â€Å"†¦it’s additionally hazy whether Oracle or Logicon is to be faulted for the tangled agreement †or whether state authorities were excessively trusting of the guaranteed cost reserve funds and permit assesses in the first place† (para. 13). It may not be clear why the tangled agreement including California and Oracle experienced in spite of deficiencies, yet it is positively clear who the significant players were. From the basic assessment of writing working on it, it can't get away from notice that both Oracle and Logicon embraced basic jobs in guaranteeing the agreement experienced. The pretended by the Department of Information Technology (DOIT) was similarly basic in encouraging a defective arrangement that examinations uncovered could have prompted the loss of a huge number of taxpayers’ cash (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Specifically, the General Services and Information Technology offices bore a substantial weight of the case (Borland, 2002)Advertising We will compose a custom article test on Oracle California explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More While perusing the different reports featuring the case, obviously Logicon occupied with versatile acts of neglect with the assistance of Ravi Mehta to win the agreement for Oracle and a short time later advantage monetarily through agreement charges and loyalties (Borland, 2002). Mehta’s most prominent commitment, it appears, was to scout for ‘political connectedness’ to win the a greement for Oracle through battle cash commitments. To be sure, senator Gray Davis had just gotten a $25,000 crusade commitment from Oracle exactly hardly any days after the arrangement was marked (Borland, 2002), not referencing that Mehta, representing Logicon, requested the help of Sen. Richard Polanco and Assemblyman Marco Firebaugh with a conspicuous goal of fixing the agreement (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Thusly, it tends to be contended, the notable pattern suggestive all through the pre-contract marking time was for Logicon to go about as the arrangement dealer while Oracle gave the money related assets expected to political moving. Inside the state offices, it is obvious from the case readings that the General Services constrained their legitimate advisors in all agreements, causing unclear legally binding terms and missing language that went far to open a fateful opening for abuse and deception (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). This specific office, related to the branch of Finan ce, had likewise been denounced for neglecting to adequately assess the state’s genuine requirement for the Oracle contract. Workers from the IT office were additionally gotten as significant players as they, related to their partners in Finance and General Services, affirmed the ELA without finding a way to approve the costs reserve funds projections introduced by Logicon (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Moving endlessly from the key players, it is basic to dissect the outcomes and the result of the agreement, just as the drawn out impacts. By a wide margin the greatest outcome of the tangled agreement was the injuring up of the state’s branch of data innovation (Gilbert, 2002b), a foundation that had been built up in 1995 to avoid IT-related framework disappointments and difficulties (Peterson 2002; California Technology Agency, 2011). A basic result or outcome of the agreement was the abdication of senior state authorities, including Eliaz Cortez, the then leader of the s tate’s division of data innovation (Gilbert, 2002b). Lawmakers who acknowledged battle commitments from Ravi Mehta of Logicon as a way to charm political favors likewise experienced substantial political difficulties the exposure.Advertising Searching for paper on business financial aspects? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More For sure, Governor Davis, who was expected for re-appointment in November 2002, needed to restore the $25,000 battle commitment encouraged by Oracle upon the marking of the agreement (Borland, 2002; Howle Hendrickson, 2002; Gilbert 2002b). It is likewise clear that both Logicon and Oracle experienced marked pictures and open notoriety, a reality that is obvious from the allegations and counter-allegations the two firms exchanged against one another during the Audit hearings. In one example, Oracle officials said they everything except overlooked Mehta’s suggestions that the product mammoth contributes cash to political battles (Borland, 2002), however they despite everything proceeded to contribute $25,000 to Governor Davis’ crusade kitty (Howle Hendrickson, 2002). Such misalignment of realities caused shame for Oracle and its principle lobbyist in the arrangement †Logicon. The drawn out impacts of the tangled agreement are

The Choosing by Liz Lochhead Analysis Essays

The Choosing by Liz Lochhead Analysis Essays The Choosing by Liz Lochhead Analysis Paper The Choosing by Liz Lochhead Analysis Paper ‘The Choosing’ by Liz Lochhead is a sonnet which portrays the significance of the decisions one makes in early periods of life. In this particular sonnet the principle topic rotates around how riches, family, various conclusions about existence and where a young lady remained during the 80s impacted one’s decision; consequently the title of the sonnet is ‘The Choosing’. In the sonnet the creator thinks about her life to her best friend’s life. In their youth days they were equivalent in nearly anything they did including their appearance, conduct at school, level in training and even houses since they were relied upon to be that way. As life proceeded onward various choices were made and the two young ladies had grown entirely unexpected characters. As the persona uncovered the choices that were accessible to the creator it appears that she is intentionally attempting to overlook them from multiple points of view. Realizing that the young ladies didn't grasp these characters themselves the persona gets mindful of the significance of one’s capacity to settle on a choice autonomously. The creator uncovers her message utilizing an assortment of idyllic gadgets including visual symbolism, generalizing, tone, Catch 22, sonnet structure, allegorical language and furthermore utilized encircling. This could likewise have been every one of the a matter of ‘choosing’. In the principal verse the creator essentially thinks about her youth days to her best friend’s. She utilized various lovely procedures including visual symbolism and generalizing to make an understood examination. Such utilization of methods animates the reader’s faculties by bringing out their own beloved recollections since it has been introduced in a manner the peruser can without much of a stretch relate back to. For instance in the line, â€Å"we were first equivalent Mary and I†, this makes a feeling of correspondence, companionship and agreeable competition. Further on in the verse, the writer composes â€Å"with same hued strips in mouse-hued hair and with equivalent shyness†, it is a generalization used to implement the way that they are equivalent or same. The creator utilizes such symbolism and generalizing to relate it to the principle subject and show that young ladies during the 80s were for the most part ‘programmed’ and did as show said as opposed to picking their own particular manners. The utilization of visual symbolism and generalizing urge the peruser to create and understanding in their brain about how young ladies during the 80s were overwhelmed by the contradicting sex. Verse two explains more on the similitudes between the two young ladies. The creator changes the tone of the sonnet towards the finish of the refrain to underline an adjustment throughout everyday life. Section one of refrain two consoles of their fellowship, â€Å"best companion too Mary and I†. It consoles of their fellowship on the grounds that at this point the persona had started to question their kinship because of the way that they were rivals. As yet in the sonnet, the tone is tranquil, quiet and well disposed as it represents how the little youngsters are happily advancing and are unconscious of the troubles and difficulties which are yet to come. The tone of the sonnet changes as the peruser approaches section six and seven, â€Å"and my horrendous dread of her predominance at sums†. The creator changes the tone to a fiercer and progressively dreadful one as it ponders the subject how the little youngsters are changing, and bolsters it with her determination of language. The peruser can see an unmistakable change in the youthful girl’s lives when taking a gander at the way that essential matured understudies who are as yet finding out about ‘sums’ are utilizing words, for example, ‘superiority’. This change provides some insight into the peruser on how they are creating, changing and confronting new difficulties throughout everyday life. The third verse advises the peruser how the young ladies originated from families with various convictions and ideas towards life. The creator exhibits this using oddity. An explanation which appears to be conflicting however has a more profound importance, on account of this sonnet it permits the peruser to rapidly separate between the two young ladies. The creator glances back at their cherished recollections and recalls where they used to live and portrayed it as, â€Å"the same houses, various homes, where the decisions were made†. This line is a case of an oddity and is the most huge and important line of the entire sonnet as it gives the peruser an understanding on how the decisions were made. They lived in the equivalent ‘houses’, another importance for house is camera and we can connect that significance with the way that outwardly everything appeared to be the equivalent simply like taking a gander at an image. Nonetheless, various homes implied that they were raised and impacted by various individuals with various thoughts about existence. So connecting the two articulations, â€Å"same houses, distinctive homes†, it is realized that the groups of the two young ladies chose their future, â€Å"where the choices were made†. This empowers the peruser to effectively interface back to the principle subject and realize that young ladies during the 80s as a rule didn't have power over their lives. Moving towards verse four, the creator shows how riches and various suppositions about existence impact ones decision. This refrain likewise features the way that during the 80s choices were made by the most prevailing individual in the family, a male or it tends to be known as present day kind of male controlled society. The creator utilizes a generalization to accentuate on how her friend’s father was an average ‘backward’ thinking man. The creator didn't know why her companion needed to leave, yet understood that her dad moved to a spot where it was increasingly moderate to live. We realize that by the line, â€Å"I don’t know precisely why they moved, yet any way they went. Something around a three-condo and a less expensive rent†. This line alludes back to the fundamental topic as it shows how cash impacted the family’s decision. It additionally shows of the thought how females around then were normally unconscious of what's going on in the house as it was the male’s job, the peruser knows it by the reality the author’s closest companion didn't reveal to her where or why she is leaving perhaps in light of the fact that she knew by any means. The creator depicted Marys father as, â€Å"Mary’s father, mufflered, differentiating unusually, with the rich greyhounds close by. He didn’t trust in secondary school instruction, particularly for young ladies, or in forking out for uniforms†. The writer utilized a generalization to make a comprehension in the reader’s brain of how Mary’s father was the very ‘harsh’ and ‘tough’ sort of man, harking back to the 80s. She at that point expresses that he didn't have faith in secondary school training for young ladies or spending on useless garbs which underscores how various thoughts about existence affected one’s decision. The fourth refrain prompts the seeing how a cutting edge sort of male centric society was as yet drilled, thinking back to the 80s which left the ladies without their very own decision. Up till this point in the sonnet we realize that the young ladies with comparable childhoods had isolated due to the family’s decisions’. In refrain five and six the creator sees Mary and begins to contrast herself again and attempts with euphorically disregard the truth. The creator utilizes allegorical discourse, for example, allegories and a great deal of engaging language to underline on the consequences of the choices which were made in the early periods of life. The second line of refrain five, â€Å"I am originating from the library-†, proposes that the author’s guardians had picked an academic way for her. While Mary’s guardians had picked a ‘family’ life for her and we realize that when the creator depicts her as, â€Å"her arms around the full-formed jar that is her body†. This is a case of an illustration, it demonstrates that Mary is pregnant and consequently has a spouse. It is obviously noticeable with respect to how the creator may have favored an unexpected way in comparison to what she has now however she is ecstatically disregarding it, by her selection of words there is a slight sign that the creator needed to live like Mary and have what show called a ‘family’ yet then she euphorically overlooks that and says, â€Å"not that I begrudge her really†. Toward the start of verse six she fortifies that she is ‘ok’ with her life or increasingly like she needs to live with it now at any rate since she didn’t have power over her life at the absolute starting point. All through the sonnet writer utilized free section and made a casing to pass on her topic through to the perusers alongside the signs inside the refrains. The creator utilized free section to feature on the way that young ladies during the 80s didn’t have their own arranged out life which they thought about, rather another person was controlling them and everything was sudden. We can likewise observe this inside refrain four where Mary didn’t realize she was going to leave yet when opportunity arrived she disappeared without knowing. The creator surrounded the sonnet with the goal that her primary topic remains clear, taking a gander at the title ‘the choosing’ it is normal that the sonnet is about somebody settle on significant choices throughout everyday life. Inside the sonnet that is demonstrated right somewhat however as the peruser approaches the last two lines, â€Å"and wonder when the decisions got made we don’t recall making†, it shows how the sonnet is about current male controlled society. Where, thinking back to the 80s ladies were constrained by men and how those decisions impacted their lives.

Major trends in HRM: Final Exam Essay

1. (TCO A) Discuss two significant patterns that are as of now influencing the act of human asset the board. Give instances of how a company’s HRM practices may be influenced by each pattern. 2. (TCO B) To be a vital business benefactor, HR must upgrade authoritative execution, extend human capital, and be financially savvy. Examine how HRM experts must adjust the contending requests made on them. 3. (TCO C) Explain the most huge effect of an association on human asset the executives. 4. (TCO D) In creating human asset systems, organizations face a few significant difficulties. Recognize and depict four of these difficulties. Connection these difficulties back to the HRM department’s methodology plan. 5. (TCO E) While cutbacks may appear to be common in our workplace today, numerous organizations despite everything face the test of holding top entertainers and the aptitudes expected to finish the activity. Clarify how you would make a proactive maintenance program for an organization. Depict the means you would make and prove each stride. 6. (TCO F) Substantiate the estimation of representative exhibition assessments to the business and the worker. Depict the variables/segments you would remember for an exhibition the executives program and approve those things. 7. (TCO G) Pay for execution plans differ in structure. Some are intended to remunerate people just as group results. Portray the two sorts of pay plans. Assess the estimation of the two plans as it identifies with the association/business. 8. (TCO H) Explain how human asset innovation can improve productivity and viability of HRM capacities. How, explicitly, would technology be able to help the business? Give a model.

Shoes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Shoes - Essay Example This paper investigates the root of shoes and the absolute most momentous creations in the shoe business. The inception of shoes goes back to around 40,000 years prior during the Middle Paleolithic age. Proof calls attention to that footwear was among the things that the old man made. The early man was constrained to gadget a methods for shielding their feet from rough landscapes, rugged rocks and hot sand in addition to other things that could hurt their feet (Yue and Yue, 1997). In early civic establishments, shoes were the most widely recognized footwear among individuals. Be that as it may, a few networks, for example, Mesopotamia had shoes. In Mesopotamia, people who live in mountains around the limit with Iran wore a delicate shoes made of wraparound cowhide. There was no checked qualification between the left and right shoes. Indeed, even by 1850, both the left and right combines of shoes remained to a great extent the equivalent with most shoes having straight keeps going. As per Yue and Yue (1997), the old shoe structures were as per the general condition of the innovator, for example, the conditions that individuals should have been shielded from just as the accessible materials. Quick development was basic for endurance, therefore â€Å"shoes should have been light-weight yet at the same time sufficient for satisfactory protection† (Yue and Yue, 1997, p.9). Shoes expected to conceal the foot and have tight grasp. In warm territories, individuals looked for level materials and tied them onto their feet bottoms while those in colder atmospheres secured their feet and legs with creature skins tying them with thongs (Yue and Yue, 1997). A significant number of the shoes that standard the present universe of design existed in the antiquated periods. Various types of shoes from thick to thin existed in the classical world. Regardless, shoes are one of the most well-known footwear among early occupants of the planet earth. Shoe despite everything sta ys basic footwear in warm nations. The antiquated Japanese had their form of shoe with a wooden sole called the geta. The geta was worn with socks known as tabi (Yue and Yue, 1997). Among the Indians was chappli, a tall knobbed shoe that was produced using the cover up of water wild ox with a wood and metal to keep the foot over the ground. Early Egyptians were related with shoes that were fundamentally made of plaited leaves of papyrus. Shoe making was a broadly recognized practice among early Egyptians. The Egyptian shoes were remarkable in that they showed up as both left and right pair not at all like most European shoes that had no distinctions. In Greece and Rome, the utilization of shoes was limited with explicit shoes being set for various events (Aswad and Meredith, 2003). In cool nations, slipper was the most well-known sort of shoes. Slipper was basic and made of one round of cowhide sewed together and had bands that were likewise made of calfskin. Shoe was normal among N ative Americans and antiquated American pioneers. The old Romans have been related with wooden soled shoes. Laborers across Europe have worn obstructs just as different shoes with wooden soles for a significant stretch of time. Like the Japanese geta, the thick wooden bottom shielded the foot from street parts, mud, stones, and cold among others. Klompen were wooden shoes in Holland and still exist today. Pattens were worn until medieval times, during Victorian periods. Among the early French was sabot, a wooden sole shoe for manufacturing plant representatives and laborers. High heel shoes, which normally rule the women’s design world, existed for the two guys and females in the antiquated occasions. These incorporate

Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis

Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis PTSD Diagnosis Print Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis By Matthew Tull, PhD twitter Matthew Tull, PhD is a professor of psychology at the University of Toledo, specializing in post-traumatic stress disorder. Learn about our editorial policy Matthew Tull, PhD Updated on October 21, 2019 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Overview Symptoms & Diagnosis Causes & Risk Factors Treatment Living With In Children Tetra Images / Creative RF / Getty Images Have you recently been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and are you thinking of disclosing your PTSD diagnosis to someone? This can be a stressful experience, as well as a positive one. When someone learns that they have PTSD, they may not be that surprised. Receiving a diagnosis can actually be a positive experience. People may be comforted by the fact that there is a name for the number of symptoms that they are experiencing. Being diagnosed with PTSD may also bring about a sense of hope. Even though recovery from PTSD can be a long and difficult road, there are a number of effective treatments for PTSD. However, PTSD may also be associated with some stigma. That is, some people may view PTSD as a sign that they are weak or damaged in some way. They may be ashamed of having the diagnosis or view it as their fault, as though they did something to cause it. Outsiders may think this of those diagnosed as well. As a result, people may avoid disclosing their diagnosis to people they are close to, such as family and friends. The Importance of Telling Others Disclosing that you have PTSD to people in your life (especially loved ones) is important. Loved ones can be an excellent source of social support, which has been found to be incredibly beneficial for people with PTSD. Social support may speed up recovery from PTSD and help someone overcome the effects of a traumatic event. Yet, telling others about your PTSD diagnosis can be a very difficult and stressful thing to do. Here are some tips that may make the process of disclosing your PTSD to loved ones a bit easier. How to Help a Loved One With PTSD Learn About the Diagnosis Before you tell anyone about your PTSD diagnosis, it is important that you understand the diagnosis yourself. Learn as much as you can about PTSD. PTSD is often misunderstood, and it is very possible that your loved ones will have many questions about PTSD. Make sure that you can address those questions or, at the very least, direct them to resources to get their questions answered. Identify People That You Trust and Who Can Provide Support You do not need to tell everyone about your PTSD. Who should you tell? Share the information with those people who are going to be understanding, trustworthy, and supportive. There are a number of characteristics that you should look for in establishing a source of social support. In deciding who to tell about your PTSD diagnosis, try to see who in your life has a number of these characteristics. Coping With PTSD Set Aside a Time to Tell Others After you identify who you are going to tell about your PTSD diagnosis, make sure you set aside a good time to do so. Telling someone about your PTSD diagnosis can be a stressful thing to do. It may be uncomfortable and/or anxiety-provoking for you. It can be an emotional experience for both people involved, so make sure that you do it in a place and at a time that is not stressful for you. Invite a friend over for tea. Take a family member out to lunch. You want to set up a situation where you have the persons undivided attention. You Choose What to Disclose What to disclose is completely up to you. Give the person enough information to understand the diagnosis and make sure to let them know how they can help. You do not need to tell your loved ones everything. For example, you do not need to disclose specific information about your traumatic event. If someone asks you an uncomfortable question that you do not want to answer, it is perfectly OK to simply say, Im sorry, but I am not ready to talk about that yet. Prepare beforehand by coming up with some things you can say if someone asks you a question you do not want to answer. Eliminate Confusion About PTSD Be prepared to give them the basics on PTSD. Tell them what symptoms commonly occur in PTSD and why. If you are telling someone who is going to be providing you with social support, it is important that they have a good foundation of knowledge on PTSD. They need to understand why certain symptoms and behaviors occur, what they look like, and how they can be addressed. Talk to Others With PTSD If you know other people with PTSD, talk to them to see how they disclosed their diagnosis to loved ones. What worked well for them? What would they do differently if they had to do it again? You can gain some valuable information from the experiences of others with PTSD or who are recovering from PTSD. Prepare Yourself in Case They Dont Understand Finally, prepare yourself for the possibility that someone may not be supportive or understanding of what you are going through. Sometimes people may not be ready to hear what you have to tell them. This can be a very difficult experience to encounter, and it has the potential to make you feel ashamed or embarrassed. It may also prevent you from seeking out support from others. Before you tell anyone about your PTSD, make sure you have some coping skills ready to deal with the possibility that someone may not give you the response you want. Remind yourself that that is about them, not you. Remember You Are in Control In the end, it is important for you to know that you do not have to disclose your PTSD to anyone before you are ready. You are in control. You decide who to disclose your diagnosis to and when. PTSD is never a sign of weakness, and it is never the fault of the person with the diagnosis. Surrounding yourself with people who understand, care for and support you, can greatly reduce the stigma around a PTSD diagnosis and ?aid in recovery. PTSD can be a difficult diagnosis to cope with. However, recovery is definitely possible. Treatments for PTSD

Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis

Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis PTSD Diagnosis Print Disclosing Your PTSD Diagnosis By Matthew Tull, PhD twitter Matthew Tull, PhD is a professor of psychology at the University of Toledo, specializing in post-traumatic stress disorder. Learn about our editorial policy Matthew Tull, PhD Updated on October 21, 2019 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Overview Symptoms & Diagnosis Causes & Risk Factors Treatment Living With In Children Tetra Images / Creative RF / Getty Images Have you recently been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and are you thinking of disclosing your PTSD diagnosis to someone? This can be a stressful experience, as well as a positive one. When someone learns that they have PTSD, they may not be that surprised. Receiving a diagnosis can actually be a positive experience. People may be comforted by the fact that there is a name for the number of symptoms that they are experiencing. Being diagnosed with PTSD may also bring about a sense of hope. Even though recovery from PTSD can be a long and difficult road, there are a number of effective treatments for PTSD. However, PTSD may also be associated with some stigma. That is, some people may view PTSD as a sign that they are weak or damaged in some way. They may be ashamed of having the diagnosis or view it as their fault, as though they did something to cause it. Outsiders may think this of those diagnosed as well. As a result, people may avoid disclosing their diagnosis to people they are close to, such as family and friends. The Importance of Telling Others Disclosing that you have PTSD to people in your life (especially loved ones) is important. Loved ones can be an excellent source of social support, which has been found to be incredibly beneficial for people with PTSD. Social support may speed up recovery from PTSD and help someone overcome the effects of a traumatic event. Yet, telling others about your PTSD diagnosis can be a very difficult and stressful thing to do. Here are some tips that may make the process of disclosing your PTSD to loved ones a bit easier. How to Help a Loved One With PTSD Learn About the Diagnosis Before you tell anyone about your PTSD diagnosis, it is important that you understand the diagnosis yourself. Learn as much as you can about PTSD. PTSD is often misunderstood, and it is very possible that your loved ones will have many questions about PTSD. Make sure that you can address those questions or, at the very least, direct them to resources to get their questions answered. Identify People That You Trust and Who Can Provide Support You do not need to tell everyone about your PTSD. Who should you tell? Share the information with those people who are going to be understanding, trustworthy, and supportive. There are a number of characteristics that you should look for in establishing a source of social support. In deciding who to tell about your PTSD diagnosis, try to see who in your life has a number of these characteristics. Coping With PTSD Set Aside a Time to Tell Others After you identify who you are going to tell about your PTSD diagnosis, make sure you set aside a good time to do so. Telling someone about your PTSD diagnosis can be a stressful thing to do. It may be uncomfortable and/or anxiety-provoking for you. It can be an emotional experience for both people involved, so make sure that you do it in a place and at a time that is not stressful for you. Invite a friend over for tea. Take a family member out to lunch. You want to set up a situation where you have the persons undivided attention. You Choose What to Disclose What to disclose is completely up to you. Give the person enough information to understand the diagnosis and make sure to let them know how they can help. You do not need to tell your loved ones everything. For example, you do not need to disclose specific information about your traumatic event. If someone asks you an uncomfortable question that you do not want to answer, it is perfectly OK to simply say, Im sorry, but I am not ready to talk about that yet. Prepare beforehand by coming up with some things you can say if someone asks you a question you do not want to answer. Eliminate Confusion About PTSD Be prepared to give them the basics on PTSD. Tell them what symptoms commonly occur in PTSD and why. If you are telling someone who is going to be providing you with social support, it is important that they have a good foundation of knowledge on PTSD. They need to understand why certain symptoms and behaviors occur, what they look like, and how they can be addressed. Talk to Others With PTSD If you know other people with PTSD, talk to them to see how they disclosed their diagnosis to loved ones. What worked well for them? What would they do differently if they had to do it again? You can gain some valuable information from the experiences of others with PTSD or who are recovering from PTSD. Prepare Yourself in Case They Dont Understand Finally, prepare yourself for the possibility that someone may not be supportive or understanding of what you are going through. Sometimes people may not be ready to hear what you have to tell them. This can be a very difficult experience to encounter, and it has the potential to make you feel ashamed or embarrassed. It may also prevent you from seeking out support from others. Before you tell anyone about your PTSD, make sure you have some coping skills ready to deal with the possibility that someone may not give you the response you want. Remind yourself that that is about them, not you. Remember You Are in Control In the end, it is important for you to know that you do not have to disclose your PTSD to anyone before you are ready. You are in control. You decide who to disclose your diagnosis to and when. PTSD is never a sign of weakness, and it is never the fault of the person with the diagnosis. Surrounding yourself with people who understand, care for and support you, can greatly reduce the stigma around a PTSD diagnosis and ?aid in recovery. PTSD can be a difficult diagnosis to cope with. However, recovery is definitely possible. Treatments for PTSD